describe various leadership styles based on the use of authority: The 6 Most Common Leadership Styles & How to Find Yours

They are not only committed to helping the organization achieve its goals, but also to helping group members fulfill their potential. People who work under such leaders tend to get along well, support one another, and consult other members of the group when making decisions. Authoritarian leaders are often described as controlling and close-minded, yet this overlooks the potential positives of stressing rules, expecting obedience, and taking responsibility.

This kind of leadership is desirable in mainly professional organizations and where the employees are self-motivated. This type of style involves the leader including one or more employees in the decision making process . However, the leader maintains the final decision making authority. Using this style is not a sign of weakness; rather it is a sign of strength that your employees will respect. This mode of leadership produces good and quick results if the followers are highly educated and brilliant and have a sincere desire to go ahead and perform with responsibility. By understanding various frameworks of leadership and how they work, those who are stepping up to lead can develop their own approaches to leadership and be more effective.

1-1 describe various leadership styles based on the use of authority states that minimum equal effort is put to achieve the organisation goal. The leader permits the group to make decision within prescribed limits – In this, the group completely, makes the decision. The leader takes the decision – He identifies and analyses the problem. It increases the acceptance of management’s ideas and reduces resistance to change.

Which Leadership Style is the Best?

A good example of a traditional authority system would be a monarchy. Most governments throughout history have led according to this form of authority. Library Best practices, research, and tools to fuel individual and business growth. Our mission is to provide an online platform to help students to discuss anything and everything about Economics. This website includes study notes, research papers, essays, articles and other allied information submitted by visitors like YOU. Exertion of minimum effort is required to get work done and sustain organisational morale.

The leader uses his power for the interest of his group and motivates his followers. Then the productivity is increased and the followers get full satisfaction from their job. The democratic style is also suitable where subordinates have accepted the goal of the organisation and leader is willing to share the decision making with subordinates. This style of Leadership involves subordinates in the process of decision making. The leader decentralizes his authority at few extents and allows the subordinates to share his power.

Leadership Style Based on the Use of Authority

Not to be confused with authoritarian leadership, authoritative leadership emphasizes a “follow me” approach. This way, leaders chart a course and encourage those around them to follow. Some leaders can already categorize their current leadership style, recognizing whether this makes them effective. It is usually the case that leaders can categorize their style; however, they often exhibit traits of many other leadership styles. A leadership style refers to a leader’s methods, characteristics, and behaviors when directing, motivating, and managing their teams.

• It also boosts the odds that good decisions will be made because it calls upon the input and insights of others.
• As a leader, it’s your responsibility to be aware of the control you hold over other people.
• Still, Lewin’s studies were influential in establishing a starting point for this kind of research.
• He is more likely practice the old saying “my way or the highway”.
• So, they show more interest in increasing the company’s productivity.

No opportunity to grow – There is a little scope for employees to exercise his/her own initiative to grow and realize his/her full potential. Nurturing love and affection – It nurtures love and affection and the consequent cooperation from the employees. He is one who influences the actions of the subordinates by frightening, criticizing and imposing penalties. He provides them with good working conditions and employee services. He works to help, guide, protect, and keep his followers happily working together as family members.

Autocratic Leadership

Measuring a leader’s ability to inspire and enable is a challenge, so researchers rely on anecdotes to supply data. And even though this theory emphasize leadership behavior, it’s difficult to determine how a leader can learn to be charismatic and transformational. The delegative style is particularly appropriate for a group of highly skilled workers, and creative teams often value this kind of freedom. On the other hand, this style does not work well for a group that lacks the needed skills, motivation or adherence to deadlines, and that can lead to poor performance. Coaching leaders are supportive, self-aware, compassionate, and communicative. The one thing to note about a transformational leader is that day-to-day details are not their priority.

If the approach emphasizes rewards, the leader uses positive leadership. If the approach emphasizes penalties, the leader is applying negative leadership. Negative leaders should be called bosses rather than leaders. Pacesetters will usually be coaches of sports teams wherein they push their students or team members to achieve a particular goal. They set the bar high, and continuously modify their milestones. This type of leader will keep his eye on the ball at all times, and will never give up.

Sociologists, however, tend to be more interested in the influences of governmental power on society and in how social conflicts arise from the distribution of power. Sociologists also examine how the use of power affects local, state, national, and global agendas, which in turn affect people differently based on status, class, and socioeconomic standing. Host regular team-building activities that highlight individuals’ strengths and communication styles. An advantage of laissez-faire leadership is the freedom to operate without restrictions or interference from management. This gives skilled and self-motivated employees a chance to reach their fullest potential. 86% of businesses worldwide say developing new leaders is their organization’s #1 challenge—and only 15% are confident in their current leadership pipelines.

“I trust you, do what you think is best” – Laissez-faire style

With this style of leadership, all of the decision-making resides with the leader, and decisions are made by the leader without consulting subordinates. Modern technology has made such forms of nonviolent reform easier to implement. Today, protesters can use cell phones and the Internet to disseminate information and plans to masses of protesters in a rapid and efficient manner. Notice that in these examples, the users of power were the citizens rather than the governments. They found they had power because they were able to exercise their will over their own leaders.

College professors, HR professionals, and teachers are examples of this type of authority. Examples of relational authority would be members of sports teams or large corporations. These members could negatively impact their groups if they do not achieve their targets.

The leader defines the limits and asks the group to make a decision – This style allows the leader to have group decision on the identified problem. The group decision should be within the limits set by the leader. Such decisions are accepted with or without modification. Leader presents ideas and invites question – In this behaviour type, leader presents his decision to fellow workers and allows them to put questions on decision. Lower level of employees may not understand the complex nature of organisation and hence their participation cannot be effective. As the ideas and suggestions of employees are considered for decision-making, they are highly motivated and their morale also is high.

The reading provides a lot of information and clarify a few questions of my own. Beside homework, I aim to exercise some of these styles into my daily routines and practically see which one of these fits right for me. If the merits and demerits of each style is talked about could be so good, it will help us understand and consume the information much easily. Yes, examples would be nice, but just think of your friends and family’s.

https://1investing.in/al leadership is a leadership style that adapts to the situation—in some cases the leader may behave in a more laissez-faire way, in others they may be more authoritative. It’s a leadership style that is adaptable and flexible, requiring a high level of expertise and confidence from the leader. An example of affiliative leadership can be seen in healthcare settings. The director of a behavioral health department, for instance, will be focused on the emotional needs of therapists and work closely with them to ensure these needs are met.

Any business can adopt this kind of leadership — it’s a great leadership style to boost morale and make people care about their work. Because of their focus on employee satisfaction, they tend to achieve higher levels of respect. This type of leader is the kind of person to have regular one-on-one meetings to hear struggles, concerns, or new ideas.

Pick and choose techniques that best fit the team or task at hand and adapt them along the way as needed. Effective leadership is and always has been about knowing what techniques to use and when. Servant leaders enrich the lives of others by focusing on building better organizations and ultimately creating a world that is more caring and equitable. The servant leader dedicates himself or herself to the growth and well being of people in the community. Instead of focusing on accumulating power, this leader shares power and helps others perform as highly as possible.

This was present in the past, especially when many of these types of leaders were also present in politics. This type of leadership was reflected in Adolf Hitler, Genghis Khan and many more. This leadership style has still been widely prevalent in small firms in India. Thanks for this brief and straight-to-the- point examination of various leadership styles. However, I will to have each style illustrated by concrete and real world examples. Wow, I have less words to say all I can only seek is great appreciation from this lecture.